We are often asked by clients about funds that are being lent to them or gifted by parents to help them buy a house, buy a business, or just because the client is a good person, and so they are to be the recipient of a gift.
The Australian Tax Office won a case handed down by the Federal Court in July 2024. In that case, the Tax Commissioner successfully argued that more than $1.6m deposited in a couple’s bank account was assessable income, not a gift or a loan from friends.
The case of Rusanova and the Commissioner of Taxation is a real-life drama that could easily be the plot of a telemovie. It features an Australian resident Russian couple who received ‘gifts’ of over $1.6m in unexplained bank deposits, over $67,000 in interest, a Russian father-in-law who is a seafood exporter, a series of Australian companies, and a generous friend who loaned money in $20,000 tranches.
The crux of the case before the Federal Court is whether you can prove to the ATO that unexplained deposits should be treated as gifts or loans. However, if the Tax Commissioner suspects the deposits are income, he can issue a default tax assessment and decide what tax should be paid. The burden of proof is then on the taxpayer to prove the Tax Commissioner wrong, underscoring the potentially serious consequences of the ATO’s suspicion.