Australian businesses are increasingly turning to international contractors to fulfill roles. However, recent developments in employment law highlight the need for caution, as even overseas workers can be deemed Australian employees under specific conditions.
Case Study: Ms Joanna Pascua vs. Doessel Group Pty Ltd
In a notable recent case, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) classified a Philippines-based legal assistant, Ms. Joanna Pascua, as an employee of her Australian employer, despite her independent contractor designation. Ms. Pascua’s contract, while structured as an independent agreement, ultimately led the FWC to find her position aligned more closely with employee status due to the contractual obligations and working conditions.
Key Considerations for Employers
With the passage of August 2024’s new Fair Work Act definition, employment relationships must now reflect the “true substance” of the arrangement, not just what a contract states. This change emphasises the need for clarity and accuracy when defining roles, especially with international contractors, as misclassification could result in significant tax, payroll, and workers’ compensation liabilities.
1. Contractual Clarity is Critical
Employers must evaluate the practical nature of the working relationship against any contractual descriptions. If the contractor performs tasks integral to the business or under the direction of the employer, they may meet the criteria of an employee, even if they work remotely from another country.
2. Understanding Tax and Superannuation Obligations
If a non-resident is classified as an employee, tax obligations arise only for Australian-sourced income, potentially modified by double tax agreements (DTAs). Contractors may only be taxed on Australian-sourced income, especially if they have no business presence in Australia. To avoid unexpected tax liabilities, employers should consult tax professionals familiar with relevant international DTAs.
3. Will a Foreign Worker Mean Your Business is ‘Carrying on Business’ Overseas?
Engaging foreign contractors may expose businesses to foreign taxation if deemed to be “carrying on business” through a permanent establishment abroad. This requires careful navigation of DTAs to avoid double taxation.
Conclusion
Outsourcing internationally offers businesses flexibility, but clear and compliant employment structures are essential. Employers should seek legal and tax advice to correctly define roles and manage potential liabilities effectively.
With new legislative definitions and a high court ruling favoring the “true nature” of work relationships, businesses must review their outsourcing arrangements to ensure they align with Australian legal expectations.
We are here to help
We can help you with employment law and outsourcing strategies. Contact us today.
Read more about Contractors v Employees.
